**
i.c
(2)
338
t
Government that, if the existing system proved a success, owing
to the courage and enterprise of the original Company, the
Government would reap the field which others had sown by stepping
in and gathering for itself the profit which the efforts of others
had proved could be made.
3.
The progress made by the Company in the earlier years
of working was naturally very slow, and it was not until 1912
that sufficient revenue was earned to pay a dividend to its share-
holders.
4.
The number of passengers carried on the tramway in 1905,
the first complete year of working, (exclusive of season ticket
holders) was 6,488,158, in 1910, 8,562,322, in 1915, 9,786,946
and in 1918 12,283,979.
5.
6.
The tramway to-day is run efficiently and economically,
and gives satisfaction to the Government and the public. No
justification on these grounds exists for the proposed action of
the Government nor does any other justification exist which the
Company is aware of and none has been suggested by the Government.
The Company has always been alive to extensions of its
system, which is at present a very mall one (covering only 9
route miles) and has been prepared to construct lines to open up
building areas in districta where no immediate return on the
Capital invested could be anticipated. As one instance of this,
I may mention that plans were prepared for a funicular tramway to
a proposed Portuguese settlement at Wong Nei Cheong, which scheme
however eventually fell through.
}
7.
Although Kowloon is separated by the harbour from the
Island of Hongkong, a tramway there forms a legitimate extension
of the Company's system, and in this connection I would instance
the case of the Calcutta tramways which provide a service at
Howrah, although that place is separated from Calcutta itself by
the River Hooghly. The same conditions as to fares, use of roads,
relations with Government &c. would apply.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.